Creation Theory vs Evolution Theory
This came up my mind during a swimming session with Marc, Jared, Eric, Wen Ping and Chia Haw. Something about evolution actually...
Darwin's Theory of Evolution
Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers -- all related. Darwin's general theory presumes the development of life from non-life and stresses a purely naturalistic (undirected) "descent with modification". That is, complex creatures evolve from more simplistic ancestors naturally over time. In a nutshell, as random genetic mutations occur within an organism's genetic code, the beneficial mutations are preserved because they aid survival -- a process known as "natural selection." These beneficial mutations are passed on to the next generation. Over time, beneficial mutations accumulate and the result is an entirely different organism (not just a variation of the original, but an entirely different creature).
Evolution of human (based on Darwin's Theory)
Look alike as us? Maybe the way they do "things"..
In short, humans evolve from apes, just like what we learnt back in school biology subject?
Evolution of human (based on Darwin's Theory)
Look alike as us? Maybe the way they do "things".. Wen Ping's Theory of Evolution
Ping's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from ONE common ancestor: THE MUDSKIPPER. Ping's general theory presumes the development of life from sea creatures and stresses a purely naturalistic (undirected) "descent with modification". That is, complex creatures evolve from more simplistic ancestors naturally over time. They started off without leg and the MUDSKIPPER is the first creature to adapt on land and grow some legs. Over time, beneficial mutations accumulate and the result is an entirely different organism (not just a variation of the original, but an entirely different creature).
This is a picture of a mudskipper. Cute? Think that we look alike? Think again..
.
..
...
Still think we look alike?
.
..
...
Still think we look alike?In short, humans evolve from the mudskipper. Believe it or not. It's for you to judge Ping's Theory of Evolution (unproven theory).
Ever believed this two theories? Are they real? Are they supported by strong proof?
Creation Theory (Biblical)
Even the first book in the bible says so.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Further reading on Chapter 1 tells us that God created living creatures in their own kind. And man was created soon after.
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
Well, we don't see apes start to talk like humans over millions of years of evolution yet? Or have we seen humans evolve into something else????!!!???
Evolution Theory is unable to prove many questions. Search the web on the many things that evolution theory can't prove as it is just too long for me to explain it.
Posts
1 comments:
In my opinion, evolution is an act of change. A change that occur due to many reasons. People argued that if evolution is indeed true than why does the modern ape still ape like ~ but that is a simplistic and incoherent argument because perhaps there is no need to change because at the moment, it is at its best form.
Again in my opinion, I find it difficult to believe that we are created from God image ~ the atrocity that humans are currently doing just ain't worth the entitlement.
What I think occur is the fact that after physical manifestation, the creator decided to create a non-corporeal entity i.e the soul.
And out of the billions of species, the homo erectus was chosen to be the vessel of this non-corporeal entity.
And wahlah here we are. Thats what I think.
Post a Comment